[Bazel] Fix --warn-backrefs errors in Analysis target
#170357
Conversation
Commit b262785 introduced a separate `AnalysisFpExc` target to try to workaround the lack of a bazel equivalent of single source file properties. However, this introduces backref errors when `--warn-backrefs` is enabled. This change alternatively just adds the `-ftrapping-math` copt to the entire `Analysis` target.
jmacnak
requested review from
aaronmondal,
keith and
rupprecht
as code owners
|
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers. If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
|
See also b262785#commitcomment-162242688 |
rupprecht
left a comment
rupprecht
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is fine, though I wonder if we should also do this to the cmake config so the build systems are more consistent. But I don't want to block this change on doing that.
Thanks!
|
@jmacnak Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project! Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR. Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues. How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here. If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again. If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done! |
Commit b262785 introduced a separate `AnalysisFpExc` target to try to workaround the lack of a bazel equivalent of single source file properties. However, this introduces backref errors when `--warn-backrefs` is enabled. This change alternatively just adds the `-ftrapping-math` copt to the entire `Analysis` target. Fix suggested by @rocallahan.
Commit b262785 introduced a separate `AnalysisFpExc` target to try to workaround the lack of a bazel equivalent of single source file properties. However, this introduces backref errors when `--warn-backrefs` is enabled. This change alternatively just adds the `-ftrapping-math` copt to the entire `Analysis` target. Fix suggested by @rocallahan.
3 participants
Commit b262785 introduced a separate
AnalysisFpExctarget to try to workaround the lack of a bazel equivalent of single source file properties. However, this introduces backref errors when--warn-backrefsis enabled.This change alternatively just adds the
-ftrapping-mathcopt to the entireAnalysistarget.Fix suggested by @rocallahan.